Whereas the NY Times gave Obama every opportunity, every break, it bashes Trump every chance it can. It is one thing to be liberal, it is quite another to distort.The latest attack comes on today’s front page of the Times. It accuses essentially of the president being a white supremacist. The article deals on something that I have been writing on a lot lately, South Africa. The times bends over backwards to protect the lunatic that is now president of South Africa, Ramaphosa. The Times essentially agrees with Ramaphosa in that South Africa being 8% white and owning 70% of the land is not fair, so he decides that he is going to take the land away from white people and give it to the blacks.
The Times focuses on the tweet the president made about the murdering of whites. I am not even sure his tweet was wrong, many whites have been murdered, in fact many blacks in South Africa call for the killing of the Boer(what blacks call whites their). By the omission of blacks, they want to kill whites. Does the N.Y.Times bring this up? Hell no! The liberal Times only wants to bash our president, not look at the fact as to what is going on in the corrupt South Africa. They never to wonder why South Africa used to be successful and since Mandela it has gone backwards, very backwards. The Times does not bring forth the facts as to what is happening their. This liberal paper defends South Africa’s president, an open bigot towards whites. Instead of calling on the UN to defend the white people of South Africa, it defends this lunatic who wants to change South Africa’s constitution and take the land from it’s rightful owners. I guarantee you when that happens and blacks take over the farming that production will decrease and the country will go backwards even further.