It’s Comedy Central at The CIA, FBI and The DOJ.

Robert Massimi.

   The second of the three stooges is the other circuit, media whore, Mr. James Comey. This guy is doing more touring then John Mellon Camp in his prime.  Sunday, this idiot is on T.V. stating that the Federal judge who through out Mueller’s motion, had little knowledge in the case to do so. This comes from a guy who made up his mind on the Hilary Clinton decision before he had all the facts! Now he is commenting on this particular judge who read the rule of law then made a decision? Maybe Brennan and Comey can tour together, kinda like a “Rocky Horror Picture Show”, type of act. People can go at midnight dressed like Brennan and Comey, throw stuff at the stage like they did when “Frankfurter” was moving and singing. Rather then throw toilet paper or rice, people could sling bullshit at them.
The third clown this week, and he may be the best yet, Eric”The Brut” Schneiderman. I cannot wait to see  to see what comes out about this guy. I think he may be more kinky the Anthony “Carlos Danger” Wiener. Four women so far,(look for more), have come out against the AG, that stands for Attorney General, that stands for the top cop in NY State, that means he should have some semblance of sanity. The AG, champion of women’s rights, never Trump, a stand up solid citizen, just ask him, is accused of beating the crap and torturing his secretaries and staff. I don’t know it for a fact yet, but rumors are that there was a lot of spanking, begging and pleading, as in: “who’s your daddy”. 
  So, another week, another crisis at the government. It does seem to roll off there shoulders. Remember the head of the IRS going after conservative foundations, only to have uncovered that he was giving out bonuses like he was the CEO of IBM. Someone forgot to tell him he runs a government agency and that’s not allowed, not that that dope could run anything meaningful. Remember also the IRS parties they were throwing on tax payer money? Champagne and cavier for everyone!  Wow, they know how to party, and let’s not forget the higher up at the SEC who one day watched porn for eight hours straight! He logged in one week watching thirty five hours of porn,(may be a world record).
 I keep saying it, but it is high time we rein in these people and make them accountable, it has gone on for to long, it is a comedy of errors with our government agencies, from it was the video to gee, I have forgotten or”under advise of council I refuse to answer Mr Chairman).
READ BELOW:

Ex-CIA officer: Brennan’s attacks on Trump ‘cringe-worthy,’ put national security at risk

Daniel Hoffman says the former intel chief is aiding a Russian plot to deepen America’s partisan divide

Then-CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 16, 2016, before the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on the Islamic State. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) ** FILE **
Then-CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 16, 2016, before the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on the Islamic State. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) ** FILE ** more >
– The Washington Times – Monday, May 7, 2018

A behind-the-scenes U.S. intelligence community fight over the merits of publicly scorning President Trump has burst into the open recently, with the CIA’s former Moscow station chief accusing Obama-era spymaster John O. Brennan of crossing a red line through incessant Twitter and cable news excoriations of the current commander in chief.

In addition to claiming that Mr. Brennan is aiding a Kremlin plot to deepen America’s partisan divide, former CIA Clandestine Service Officer Daniel Hoffman says the former CIA director has actually jeopardized national security by publicly insinuating that Russian President Vladimir Putin may be blackmailing Mr. Trump.

Mr. Brennan made the insinuation in late-March when he asserted during an appearance on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” that Mr. Trump is “afraid of the president of Russia” and that “one can speculate as to why.”

“The Russians may have something on [Mr. Trump] personally, that they could always roll out and make his life more difficult,” Mr. Brennan said. “That [Mr. Trump] has had this fawning attitude toward Mr. Putin…say[s] to me that he does have something to fear and something very serious to fear.”

The comments quickly became fodder for headlines in other news outlets. But they also had something of an explosive impact inside the intelligence community, where many recoiled at the notion that the former CIA chief had made a public declaration on a matter U.S. spy agencies have never weighed in on conclusively.

Apparently aware of this, Mr. Brennan wasted little time trying to rectify the situation by reiterating that he was only speculating. Within just a few hours of the MSNBC interview, he told The New York Times that, “I do not know if the Russians have something on Donald Trump that they could use as blackmail.”

But for Mr. Hoffman, the damage was done.

“What I found cringe-worthy,” he says, “is that Brennan was insinuating that Vladimir Putin could control President Trump and that Brennan’s choice of the word ‘speculate’ would be lost on the audience because of his previous position as director of the CIA.”

The former station chief initially took his concern public with an early-April article for The Cipher Brief, a publication known for its commentary by former intelligence officials. There, Mr. Hoffman argued that vital foreign liaison partners, upon whom American spy agencies depend to steal secrets from Russia and other adversaries, “must have been shocked and concerned over Brennan’s allegation.”

“I felt like if Brennan wanted to make the kind of allegation he made, he should have done it through the established process, by going and speaking privately about it to Special Counsel Robert Mueller,” Mr. Hoffman more recently told The Washington Times.

“That way, he could avoid collateral damage to those with whom we are working, whether it’s a spy who’s risking his life to be the source of secrets for us, who’s now going to wonder whether he should be doing that because his boss Vladimir Putin has dirt on our president, or a partner liaison service, which might want to work with us against the Russia target.”

It’s an argument whose nuance has so far gone largely overlooked by the mainstream media. To the contrary, several news outlets have had a field day focusing on more rudimentary insults Mr. Brennan has hurled at Mr. Trump, such as his recent assertion on Twitter that the president’s “self-adoration is disgraceful.”

The former CIA director made headlines tweeting last month that the president’s “kakistocracy” — a reference to government run by the worst, least qualified or most unscrupulous citizens — was “collapsing after its lamentable journey.”

His criticism comes against a backdrop in which U.S. lawmakers will debate this week whether to embrace longtime Clandestine Service operative Gina Haspel as the next CIA director. If confirmed, Ms. Haspel will become the first female director and the first career agency officer in decades with a background in operations — rather than a political appointee — to serve in the post.

Fears of a deep state

Mr. Brennan declined to comment for this article.

Conservatives have largely disregarded his Trump criticism as base partisanship emanating from a former official of the Obama administration, where Mr. Brennan served in various intelligence-related advisory capacities prior to being tapped to head the CIA from 2013 through 2017.

But within the wider intelligence community, Mr. Brennan’s statements, as well as Mr. Hoffman’s attempt to counter them, are being watched with intense interest.

“This dispute that’s going on raises two issues,” said former CIA and National Security Agency Director Michael V. Hayden. “Number one is, look, the Russians are doing things to mess with our heads and to divide us and so when we get into this kind of discussion, however well merited it might be, it does seem to push the Russian agenda a bit.”

“At the same time, we’re allowed to speak out and to argue. The Russian objective may well be to get us to argue with one another and here we are in this argument. But that’s not an ironclad argument against arguing,” Mr. Hayden told The Times.

“Number two though, is that we have a president who’s more norm busting than any president in our history, so a lot of people who think norms should be respected are pushing back,” he said. “But at what point do we run the danger that in pushing back, we violate our own norms?”

In his new book, ‘The Assault on Intelligence; American National Security in an Age of Lies,’ Mr. Hayden goes to length exploring such challenges facing the intelligence community in the Trump era.

It’s an era some believe got off to a rocky start when Mr. Trump went off script during a visit to CIA headquarters in the early days of his presidency. Speaking at the time in front of the Memorial Wall honoring agency employees who’ve died in the line of duty, Mr. Trump suddenly began harping about the media’s unfair treatment of him, personally, saying journalists “are the most dishonest human beings on earth.”

One former high-level intelligence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the fight now playing out between Mr. Brennan and Mr. Hoffman is representative of a sharp division within the intelligence community over whether and how it should respond to such behavior.

Brennan comes down on the gotta speak out side and Hoffman comes out on the you’re only adding fuel to the fire side,” said the former official, who added that while both have their merits, Mr. Brennan has gone so far in his criticisms of Mr. Trump that he’s merely feeding the view held by some administration supporters that there’s a “deep state” conspiring to undermine president.

Another former high-level official, who also spoke only on condition of anonymity, said Mr. Brennan’s blackmail speculation on live television was a kind of “holy [expletive] moment” for many in the intelligence community.

Interest only elevated a few weeks later, when Mr. Hoffman entered the fray to call the former director out.

It’s gotten personal

That a visceral fight is now playing out between the two former high-level CIA officials is “unprecedented,” said yet another intelligence source, who also spoke on condition of not being named.

The source suggested the dispute may actually be a very personal between a long-time field operator and his former bureaucrat-analyst boss. Mr. Brennan spent 25 years at the CIA as an analyst before rising through the politically-appointed bureaucratic ranks to head the agency under Mr. Obama, while Mr. Hoffman’s career was one dominated more by time in the bare-knuckle and secretive shadows of the intelligence world.

“They’re not peers in any sense,” said the source, who knows both men personally. “Dan was a division chief, senior operations guy, but that’s many, many rungs away from director of the CIA…[Dan] had very senior positions, but not anywhere near John’s stature.”

For Mr. Hoffman, it’s irrelevant. He says his argument is simple: Mr. Brennan went too far with the blackmail speculation and his comments could jeopardize sensitive foreign intelligence sources relied upon by Washington.

In an interview with The Times, the former station chief lamented that other media outlets have so-far failed to grasp the gravity of what he’s getting at.

During April interviews on National Public Radio and NBC’s “Meet the Press,” hosts lobbed Mr. Brennan questions only about whether he was concerned by Mr. Hoffman’s other assertion, that Mr. Brennan is “doing Putin’s bidding” by attacking Mr. Trump in a way that could be construed as divisive and partisan.

“When Brennan was on ‘Meet the Press’ with Chuck Todd, they twisted my [argument] into something it wasn’t,” said Mr. Hoffman. “John Brennan made it appear as if I was criticizing him for criticizing Trump’s Russia policy, when in fact, I had a much more nuanced point that I was making, which was that John Brennan should not be speculating about Vladimir Putin being able to blackmail the president.”

He added that Mr. Brennan is “certainly protected by freedom of speech to criticize a current administration in a partisan way, what he did took it too far in my view.”

Brennan’s side of this

Nick Shapiro, who formerly Mr. Brennan’s deputy chief of staff at the CIA, took issue with Mr. Hoffman’s “logic.”

“One could even argue that it is Dan who is doing Putin’s bidding by criticizing Brennan for criticizing Trump, as Russia seems to welcome any and all discord and since Putin and Trump seem so closely aligned,” Mr. Shapiro told The Times.

“These are not normal days. We’re seeing a growing chorus of former national security leaders who have served presidents of both parties, speaking out to warn us about Trump,” he said. “They aren’t becoming partisans, this isn’t about politics. Instead of throwing accusations at these dedicated patriots, we should all be concerned about why they feel the need to speak out — not that they are doing so.”

Further, Mr. Shapiro called it absurd for Mr. Hoffman to focus on the potentially jeopardizing impact that Mr. Brennan’s “speculation” on Mr. Putin blackmailing Mr. Trump might have on foreign spying alliances. “It is quite the overreach to hang it on Brennan — after all that Trump has done and himself said — that allies would be concerned,” he said.

Mr. Hoffman disagreed. “There’s certainly plenty to debate about the president’s policy toward Russia, his holding back on sanctions and the laudatory things he’s said about Vladimir Putin,” the former station chief said.

“But there’s a difference between that and insinuating — from a position of someone who should have known as director of the CIA — that Vladimir Putin could blackmail the president.

Brennan offered zero evidence that Vladimir Putin could blackmail the president,” Mr. Hoffman added.

“Look,” he said. “Whatever damage Brennan thinks Trump is causing with his Russia policy, I don’t understand why Brennan thinks he needs to pile on and make it worse.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link “Have a Disqus Account?”. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

Popular In the Community
Sponsored

Sponsored

Inside the Beltway: ‘Stormy news’ overshadows Democratic message
NYY32311
32m
It’s also why Fox’s lowest rated show outperforms CNN’s best rated show while print media swirls the toilet too. ‘Stormy news’ overshadows Democratic message – quick donkeys, what was the name of the Roy Moore accuser? Tick Tock Stormy, your destiny awaits you in the dustbin of Who? Donkeys have had almost 2 years to talk issues and they have – identity politics and herd-think.
Daniel Hoffman, ex-CIA officer: Brennan’s Trump attacks risk national security
TraderJo
22h
Have never referred to someone as a POS, but I’ll make an exception in Brennan’s case!
Donald Trump slaps sanctions on Iran after formally withdrawing from nuclear deal
Phantom1973
5h
Fears that they might fast track a nuclear weapon? WTF are we really so naive that we think that is not already in progress?Europe is concerned that not continuing to appease Iran is going to ‘destabilize’ the Middle East?Good God has Neville Chamberlain reincarnated? Did we not learn anything from World War 2?Evil is EVIL and it is never deterred by appeasement. It is only emboldened by weakness.
Broward school district admits Nikolas Cruz was referred to PROMISE program in ‘stunning’ reversal
Susan Robbins
1d
Kids who are a discipline problem should be suspended at a higher rate regardless of race… if blacks have a tendency to be more of a behavior problem due to lack of parental guidance, they should be suspended and the parents taken to task. Why should white students who misbehave have to face the consequences minority students do not? Is the capability of good behavior absent in minority children…no. And it does not take money to raise civil children.
BEN CARSON: Obama’s housing rules try to accomplish what busing could not
Harry Huntington
24 Jul, 2015
Huh? Suburbs use zoning laws expressly to prevent poor people from moving in. The purpose of Obama’s new housing initiative is to block such discriminatory laws. Obama should go further and should aggressively build public housing in the richest communities. That is not socialism as Mr. Carson calls it. That is smart policy. Until the 1950s in America, most towns contained rich and poor people. Rich and poor kids went to school together. Time to fix the mistakes that have crept into American housing and let everyone live like good neighbors.
Viktor Vekselberg payments to Michael Cohen investigated by Robert Mueller: report
Department of Injustice
1h
So let me get this straight, liberals believe Trump is working for the Russians, but Trump is doing a better job fixing America than any other president has in about 30 years, is that right? Shouldn’t he try to destroy America instead of making it better? Remove sanctions against Russia instead of adding more? I think the true enemy of America is liberals.
AT&T paid Michael Cohen’s Essential Consulting for ‘insights’ on Trump administration
NYY32311
27m
Another piece of fecal matter bent on keeping a hooker in print.I love the leftards are this butthurt and relying on a hooker.
Donald Trump’s polls improve despite 90% negative coverage: Study
BlueGumRevival
8h
Imagine if Trump had the same supportive media that Obama had.  MAGA.
‘Rescission’ package: Donald Trump to demand Congress cut $15 billion in spending
cleo48
1d
God bless him. It’s a start.
Michelle Obama, take your snottiness and go
rkbsmith
12h
So, my take is if a woman makes a rational decision NOT to vote the Democratic ticket/candidate, then something MUST be wrong with them. But, if the woman makes a rational decisioin to vote the Democratic ticket/candidate then they are intelligent. I’m sorry, I can’t follow that logic and I think a lot of other folks in the country can’t either. Just go away….you had your 8 years as being first Lady.//
John Kerry’s 57 varieties of mischief
GreenSword
19h
The widow of a billionaire. Neither she nor Kerry made the money they’re now spending on their luxury life style.
Gonzaga University warns ‘non-Mexican individuals’ against ‘cultural appropriation’ on Cinco de Mayo
odayterrence
1d
Did this University ban Hispanic students from drinking on St. Patrick’s Day? Are Hispanic students banned/discouraged from any White activities/culture to avoid cultural appropriation?
Michael Avenatti suggests Russians reimbursed Michael Cohen for Stormy Daniels payment
BlueBus
2h
What’s worse and more unbelievable than a lying whore??…the whore’s lawyer!!!
Benjamin Netanyahu’s presentation of Iranian duplicity voids the Obama administration’s nuclear deal
Jim Russell
4d
Bibi is a lying willing war monger with our military and our money in his and his nations interest, not ours As we and our Allies know we have smart intrusive verification of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. We should not be stampeded by lies or ignorance into provocation, withdrawal, or war by a war monger and an incompetent, clueless President.
America’s faith is a beacon, and must not be extinguished
8106
20h
Three-quarters of America attests to belief in God. How much more do you want?
Sponsored

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide

Top Stories

Quantcast

https://px.owneriq.net/eps?pt=sholic&pid=1693&uid=Q5791100122118681865J&l=true

7 people typing

https://n-cdn.areyouahuman.com/kitten?ak=6a9e165ab61a20ebf8cd83aafec13b371&pk=YNMJrK4lsMAJlxSsJDb17LW8YmmHRLakZxkWagp6&AYAH_VERSION=2.0&cookiesync=true&AYAH_F1=Lotame&AYAH_P2=489eb528-799e-4f58-be30-85fd0ec89e90&AYAH_F2=washingtontimes.com

 

 

 

Author: nobullwithragingrobert

Was a drama critic at Manhattan College. Wrote professionally for Bergen News, Sun Bulletin . Alpha Sigma Lambda, Beta Theta. Has seen over 600 shows worldwide, has published both on Theater and Politics. Avid reader on many subjects and writers. Chief Drama critic for Metropolitan magazine. Writes for Jerrick media, American conservative, The City Journal and Reason magazine. Has produced shows both on and off Broadway.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: